Cost V Value Arguments in Business to Business Sales

The single most common reason sales people give for losing a sale is that they were too expensive compared to the competition. Strangely this is never the reasons customers give for choosing a supplier. In survey after survey customers give as their primary reason for choosing a supplier is that the supplier met their requirements and/or showed them a return on their investment. Customers in B2B sales almost never give price as the main or even secondary factor. Even given that there will be some reticence to say they bought the lowest priced bidder (excluding the public sector), there is still a huge gulf between sales people and their customers as to why a customer didn't buy their solution which was clearly the best, most functional etc..

The reason most customers give for not buying a particular solution as against another is complex but boils down to a couple of major factors. Customers first of all can see little differentiation between competing brands and therefore choose the one they are most familiar and comfortable with, or one they trust the most. Second, if a B2B customer is to choose a particular product or service then they will choose the one that gives them the best return on investment.

For those of us involved in sales for longer than a couple of years, nothing much has changed. Companies have always bought based on criteria of familiarity, trust and payback. What is different nowadays is the formality with which this is measured by the pragmatic buyer. It would be a great service if Marketers therefore turned their attention to Return on Investment (ROI) messages in their marketing strategies.

There is no hiding place for the organisation that proposes products and services based purely on features. Firstly there are too many messages assailing companies, too many competing claims and far too many broken promises, for any customer to make decisions based on claim and counterclaim.

In the most recent example we have some experience of, a company had four bids for a software infrastructure project. The bids were, £400K, £500K, £800K and £1.3M. The company chose the £1.3M bid because the supplier was the only one who provided them with a Return on Investment argument. We could have expected the customer to choose the middle bids, especially since one of those bids was their incumbent supplier!

Marketing strategies need to be developed to take account of value, not simply cost or product features, and marketing programmes need to support this. Sales people need to be furnished with the tools to help them to put forward strong ROI arguments, otherwise suppliers will find their customers moving to the competition who do.

The message is clear and unequivocal. Business to business suppliers must focus on the value their products and services bring. Remember, customers only buy for three reasons to make money, save money or fulfil some intangible need.

One last point - for those of you who base your sales strategy on a compliance argument then beware if customers have to comply with a law or regulations, then they are likely to buy the cheapest option available look no farther than car insurance for proof. Companies who sell on the basis of compliance therefore still need to focus on value rather than price, if they are too avoid the trap of downward spiralling price negotiations.